As long as they are not implemented in the whole school at least all grades, the education is not fair. From a horizontal comparison, I think education equity must not be the executive list most important factor. 2. Children's vision protection I think this is relatively important because of policy, not because of social perceptions. Myopia is really a very complex problem. Looking executive list at electronic screens is only one of the factors. Now children are forced to stay up late at night to do homework, not to exercise, and to play with mobile phones, which may have a greater impact than the time spent in smart classrooms.
Even if it is outrageous, children's eyesight will never be the most worrying problem for parents. As long as the introversion in education is serious executive list enough, the competition and pressure to enter a higher school will be there. Don't parents know that attending so many cram schools in one day is excessive use of eyes? But is myopia more important or higher education? Of course, this seems to be a bit of a quibble. I don't think it can be said executive list that it has no effect, but the vision problem must not be solved by the Wisdom Classroom of Extermination. I even hope that someone in the industry will do statistics.
I believe there is little difference in the proportion of myopia in the classes that use smart classrooms and those that do not. 2. Product price 1. Politics executive list Generally speaking, we are not sensitive to the price of political mining products. Compared with the prices of products in other markets, the prices of educational informatization are almost all outrageous. Haven't felt it was a problem for years. But in the smart classroom industry, this is indeed a problem. From executive list collective equipment to personal equipment, the substantial increase in quantity is very difficult to achieve with the current investment in education funds.